Legal Opinion

Labor Force v. Frierson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 30, 2000No. 98-03225; CA A105758PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

Employer petitions for review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order awarding claimant permanent partial disability. It argues that the Board incorrectly used findings of impairment that did not meet American Medical Association (AMA) validity criteria in calculating the award. We reverse and remand.

Claimant suffered a compensable lumbar strain while lifting heavy metal tubes. When his claim was closed with no award of permanent partial disability, he requested reconsideration by a medical arbiter. See ORS 656.268(7)(a). The medical arbiter, Dr. Bald, performed a series of range-of-motion…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Roseburg Forest Products v. ClemonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. SAIF Corp. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. J a K Pizza, Inc. - Domino's v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. E. DUARTE v. SAIF CorporationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. Sunrise Electric, Inc. v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Melissa Woytko v. FabFitFun, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API