Legal Opinion

Roseburg Forest Products v. Clemons

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 26, 2000No. 97-00968; CA A101296PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

Employer Roseburg Forest Products (employer) seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirming an administrative law judge’s (ALJ) award of scheduled and unscheduled disability for claimant’s accepted claim of “left-sided sciatica.” We reverse and remand.

In May 1996, claimant experienced pain and numbness along the left posterior lateral thigh, calf, and foot while driving a forklift at work. Dr. Brazer examined claimant and diagnosed left-sided sciatica. Brazer prescribed rest and antiinflammatories, and the condition improved within a few days. Brazer recommended that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Granner v. Fairview CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marvin Wood Products v. CallowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Labor Force v. FriersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Coats-Sellers v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. SAIF Corp. v. BanderasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API