Legal Opinion

J a K Pizza, Inc. - Domino's v. Gibson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 28, 2007No. 0405660, A128930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Employer seeks judicial review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (board) concluding that claimant’s injuries, incurred while crossing a street on the way back to the workplace from a personal errand during a break, arose out of and in the course of his employment and were therefore compensable. We review the board’s legal conclusions for errors of law and its findings of fact for substantial evidence, ORS 183.482(7), (8). Because we need the board to clarify one of its findings, we remand.

The following facts were found or adopted by the board and are supported by substantial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Krushwitz v. McDonald's Restaurants of Oregon, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Norpac Foods, Inc. v. GilmoreOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. HayesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Robinson v. Nabisco, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Cope v. West American InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Legacy Health Systems v. NobleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co. v. FrazerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co. v. FrazerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API