Legal Opinion

Melissa Woytko v. FabFitFun, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided May 11, 2026No. 2:25-cv-02616Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 MELISSA WOYTKO, CASE NO. C25-2616JLR 11 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 12 FABFITFUN, INC., 13 Defendant. 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Before the court is Defendant FabFitFun, Inc.’s (“FabFitFun”) motion to compel 17 arbitration. (Mot. (Dkt. # 21); Reply (Dkt. # 27).) Plaintiff Melissa Woytko opposes the 18 motion. (Resp. (Dkt. # 24).) The court has considered the parties’ submissions, the 19 relevant portions of the record, and the governing law. Being fully advised,1 the court 20 GRANTS FabFitFun’s motion to compel…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Chiron Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API