Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Town of Stuntz v. City of Chisholm

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 19, 1937No. 30,809PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

This is an original application in this court by the town of Stuntz, in St. Louis county, to file an information in quo warranto against the city of Chisholm and its officers. The application Avas granted and the Honorable A. B. Gislason, one of the judges of the ninth judicial district, was appointed referee to take testimony, make findings of fact, and report the same to this court. Thereupon the attorney general moved to quash the writ, and the toAvn of Balkan and other taxpayers of that town and of the city moved for leave to intervene. The motion of the attorney general…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Eberhart v. EberhartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  2. State ex rel. Simpson v. Village of AliceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  3. State ex rel Douglas v. School District No. 108Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  4. State ex rel. Hilton v. Village of KinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. State Ex Rel. Peterson v. City of FraserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Danielson v. Village of MoundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. Village of LeetoniaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  3. State Ex Rel. Northern Pump Co. v. Village of FridleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. So-Called Village of St. AnthonySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. State Ex Rel. Township of Copley v. Village of WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API