Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Danielson v. Village of Mound
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 20, 1951No. 35,197PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Matson, Justice.
Upon the relation of private parties, with the consent of the attorney general, this court issued a writ of quo warranto to test the validity of the annexation of certain territory by the village of Mound in Hennepin county.
We are concerned with three areas in the immediate vicinity of Lake Minnetonka: (1) The village of Mound; (2) the unincorporated community known as Spring Park, which lies east of the village of Mound (hereinafter called Spring Park); and (3) the annexation territory herein consisting of approximately 37 acres of the industrial district of Spring Park, plus…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Eberhart v. EberhartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Wild v. People ex rel. StephensIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
- State v. Minnetonka VillageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- People ex rel. Farrington v. WhitcombIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Oelschlegel v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Town of Mt. Pleasant v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- In Re the Annexation of a Part of Donnybrook Public School District No. 24North Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Potvin v. Village of ChubbuckIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
- Reafsnyder v. City of WarsawIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- Ridings v. City of OwensboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.