Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Northern Pump Co. v. Village of Fridley

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 30, 1951No. 35,061PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Chief Justice.

This is a proceeding in the nature of quo warranto originating in this court to challenge the legality of the incorporation of the vil lage of Fridley. January 29, 1949, 25 legal voters, residing within the territory sought to be incorporated, initiated incorporation proceedings by submitting a petition for the same to the board, of county commissioners of Anoka county. The board, in response to the petition, designated a time and place for holding an election at which the legal voters within the proposed village area might express their preference in ballots cast for or…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Luley v. SimonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. State v. Minnetonka VillageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  3. State ex rel. Simpson v. Village of DoverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  4. State ex rel. Simpson v. Village of AliceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  5. St. Paul Gaslight Co. v. Village of SandstoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Danielson v. Village of MoundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Prior Lake State Bank v. National Surety Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. State Ex Rel. Town of White Bear v. City of White Bear LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. State ex rel. Village of Fridley v. City of Columbia HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. State Ex Rel. Township of Copley v. Village of WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API