Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Peterson v. City of Fraser

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 27, 1934No. 29,605PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Justice.

Quo warranto in the district court by the attorney geheral, challenging the validity of the reorganization of the village of Fraser as a city of the fourth class. Relator appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

On the Mesaba iron range in St. Louis county the cities of Chisholm and Fraser lie adjacent to each other. The former is much the larger. As far as real estate goes, the assessed valuation of both consists largely of land upon which there are iron mines and other land containing proved deposits of merchantable iron ore. Fraser Avas incorporated as a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Riggs v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Burt v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  3. State ex rel. Young v. Village of KentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. McGraw v. County CommissionersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  5. Hughes v. MilliganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Public Defender Agency v. Superior Court, Third Judicial DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Berge v. GortonWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State Ex Rel. Olsen v. Public Service CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Holtz v. BabcockMontana Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Town of Burnsville v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API