Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. So-Called Village of St. Anthony

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 4, 1947No. 34,249PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

After this proceeding in quo warranto to test the legality of the incorporation of the village of St. Anthony in Hennepin county had been referred to a referee to report findings of fact and conclusions of law and the referee had made his report pursuant to the order of reference, the matter came before us upon relator’s motion for an order vacating the decision and report of the referee and for a new trial. The grounds of the motion are alleged errors in the admission of evidence and lack of evidentiary support for the findings. We shall consider only the two grounds argued…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Eberhart v. EberhartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  2. State v. Minnetonka VillageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  3. State ex rel. Simpson v. Village of DoverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  4. State ex rel. Simpson v. Village of AliceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  5. State ex rel. Hilton v. Village of KinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Incorporation of Village of Loch ArbourSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. Grudnosky v. BislowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. State Ex Rel. Town of White Bear v. City of White Bear LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. State Ex Rel. Township of Copley v. Village of WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API