Matter of Edson
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
PEE CUEIAM.
The disciplinary infractions charged in these proceedings grow out of a calculated course of reprehensible conduct. The evidence in support thereof is devastating and largely irrefutable. No judicial response short of disbarment can be considered acceptable.
I
Respondent, George L. Edson, was charged by the District IIIB Ethics Committee (local committee or DEC) in a two-count complaint. Each count accused respondent of fabricating an extrapolation defense in a prosecution for violation of N.J.S.A. 39:4-50, driving while intoxicated (a defense since rendered invalid by State v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- State v. TischioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- In Re HughesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Application of MatthewsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Matter of TempletonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Matter of YaccarinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- In re FoleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Matter of LunnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Matter of GiordanoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- In Re ForrestSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.