Legal Opinion

Matter of Edson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 25, 1987PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEE CUEIAM.

The disciplinary infractions charged in these proceedings grow out of a calculated course of reprehensible conduct. The evidence in support thereof is devastating and largely irrefutable. No judicial response short of disbarment can be considered acceptable.

I

Respondent, George L. Edson, was charged by the District IIIB Ethics Committee (local committee or DEC) in a two-count complaint. Each count accused respondent of fabricating an extrapolation defense in a prosecution for violation of N.J.S.A. 39:4-50, driving while intoxicated (a defense since rendered invalid by State v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. State v. TischioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  3. In Re HughesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. Application of MatthewsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  5. Matter of TempletonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Matter of YaccarinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. In re FoleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  3. Matter of LunnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  4. Matter of GiordanoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  5. In Re ForrestSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API