Legal Opinion

Matter of Giordano

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 15, 1991PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

This disciplinary proceeding arose from a motion filed by the Office of Attorney Ethics (OAE) before the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB), seeking final discipline of respondent, Dominick Giordano, pursuant to Rule 1:20-6. The motion was based on respondent’s plea of guilty to the offense of tampering with public records, in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:28-7, N.J.S.A. 2C:2-6, and N.J.S.A. 2C:5-1. The DRB found that respondent has engaged in illegal conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law, and recommended that he be suspended from the practice of law for three years.

I

The case…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re HughesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Application of MatthewsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. Matter of KushnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. In Re InfinitoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  5. In Re RosenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Matter of BockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. Rodriguez v. Bar-S Food Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1983
  3. In Re Di MartiniSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  4. Matter of KornreichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  5. Data Systems Analysts, Inc. v. Netplex Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API