In Re Forrest
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
This attorney discipline proceeding arises from a complaint filed by the District XIII Ethics Committee (DEC) against respondent Robert J. Forrest. The DEC issued a report, finding that respondent had engaged in unethical conduct warranting a public reprimand. The matter proceeded to a hearing before the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB). The DRB found that respondent had failed to disclose a material fact to a tribunal, obstructed a party’s access to evidence of potential value, and engaged in conduct involving deceit, dishonesty and misrepresentation. The DRB recommended that respondent be…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Zirger v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Barcon Associates, Inc. v. Tri-County Asphalt Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Application of MatthewsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- In Re StoutSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Eastern Engineering Co. v. City of Ocean CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brundage v. Estate of CarambioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against LyonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- DAVIN, LLC v. DahamNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- In Re SeeligSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Brundage v. Estate of CarambioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.