Legal Opinion

In Re Forrest

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 11, 1999PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This attorney discipline proceeding arises from a complaint filed by the District XIII Ethics Committee (DEC) against respondent Robert J. Forrest. The DEC issued a report, finding that respondent had engaged in unethical conduct warranting a public reprimand. The matter proceeded to a hearing before the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB). The DRB found that respondent had failed to disclose a material fact to a tribunal, obstructed a party’s access to evidence of potential value, and engaged in conduct involving deceit, dishonesty and misrepresentation. The DRB recommended that respondent be…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Zirger v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  2. Barcon Associates, Inc. v. Tri-County Asphalt Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. Application of MatthewsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  4. In Re StoutSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  5. Eastern Engineering Co. v. City of Ocean CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brundage v. Estate of CarambioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against LyonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. DAVIN, LLC v. DahamNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  4. In Re SeeligSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  5. Brundage v. Estate of CarambioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API