Legal Opinion

Crystal Bottled Waters v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 21, 1993No. 1 CA-IC 91-0139PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOCI, Judge.

This is a review of an award for permanent partial disability. In finding that the employee suffered lost-earning capacity based upon work as a light-duty delivery driver, the administrative law judge (“AU”) rejected the uneontradicted opinion of petitioners’ vocational expert that higher-paying work as a limousine driver would be suitable and affirmatively found that such work would be unsuitable. We hold that: (1) the AU may properly disregard a vocational expert’s uncontradicted opinion that certain work is suitable for claimant and (2) the AU properly inferred from the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Revles v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Zimmerman v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Le Duc v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  4. Roach v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Brooks v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hackworth v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  2. Gary D. Hackworth v. Atlas Copco North America and Liberty Mutual Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. Rivera v. terros/copperpointCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API