Crystal Bottled Waters v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOCI, Judge.
This is a review of an award for permanent partial disability. In finding that the employee suffered lost-earning capacity based upon work as a light-duty delivery driver, the administrative law judge (“AU”) rejected the uneontradicted opinion of petitioners’ vocational expert that higher-paying work as a limousine driver would be suitable and affirmatively found that such work would be unsuitable. We hold that: (1) the AU may properly disregard a vocational expert’s uncontradicted opinion that certain work is suitable for claimant and (2) the AU properly inferred from the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Revles v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Zimmerman v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Le Duc v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Roach v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Brooks v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hackworth v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Gary D. Hackworth v. Atlas Copco North America and Liberty Mutual Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Rivera v. terros/copperpointCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019