Brooks v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONA
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EUBANK, Judge.
The issue presented in this special action review of an award of the Industrial Commission denying compensability, is whether the administrative law judge correctly denied the peitioners’ claims for workmen’s compensation benefits on the basis of the “going and coming” rule. In view of the totality of the facts and the law applicable to them, we are of the opinion that the award denying petitioners’ claims for benefits is correct. We therefore affirm the award.
The petitioners are surviving workers, or dependents of deceased workers, who were involved in a traffic accident…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Malinski v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Kobe v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Butler v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Pauley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Serrano v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1953
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hunt Bldg. Corp. v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ.Arizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Forgach v. George Koch & Sons Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Joplin v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Connors v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Torres v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.