Cameron v. . Highway Com.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STACY, J., concurring; CLARKSON, J., concurring, in part. The chief purpose of this action is to enjoin the defendants from building a highway between Durham and Oxford via Creedmoor. Between thesetermini phere is a public road which passes through the town of Stem, and is now, and for about three years has been, under the control of the State Highway Commission. The former is referred to in the record as the Creedmoor route, and the latter as the Stem route. In 1923 the plaintiffs and others filed with the commissioner of the Fourth District a petition that the Stem route be laid with a hard…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hyatt v. Dehart.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Jones v. . BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
- Mayo v. Commissioners of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- School Committee of Seventy-First Consolidated School District v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Lee v. Town of WaynesvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Styers v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Mosteller v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Pelham Realty Corp. v. Board of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State Highway Commission v. Greensboro City Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.