School Committee of Seventy-First Consolidated School District v. Board of Education
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
The cardinal question presented in the argument here is whether the board of education had the legal right to change the site of the proposed schoolhouse from Clifton to Glendale. His Honor found as a fact that in making the change the board was actuated by no improper motive, but he held as a legal inference that upon the facts in the case the change was ultra vires, or if not, that it amounted to an oppressive and manifest abuse of discretion. This conclusion, we presume, was based chiefly on the finding that the potential factor in the election of 17 November, 1921, was the board’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brodnax v. GroomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
- Person v. Board of State Tax CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Davenport v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- McCracken v. Greensboro, Northern & Atlantic Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Lee v. Town of WaynesvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- McInnish v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Moore v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Board of Education v. . ForrestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Cameron v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Plott v. . Comrs.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.