Mosteller v. Southern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSea well, J.
Tbe plaintiffs rely on alternative propositions, either of wbicb, tbey contend, puts tbe defendant in tbe wrong: (1) Tbat tbe relocation of tbe highway constituted an abandonment by tbe Highway Commission of tbe discontinued portion of tbe old road, wbicb, as tbey contend, automatically, under C. S., 3838 (b) (Michie’s Code, 1939), gave it tbe status of a neighborhood public road, wbicb defendant bad no right to obstruct; (2) tbat there bad been a complete official abandonment or vacation of tbe road, in wbicb case, as persons who bad purchased and built adjacent thereto on tbe faith of its…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bynum v. . PoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Insurance Co. v. . Carolina BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Davis v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- R. R. v. . GoldsboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Davis v. . AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- CCT Equipment Co. v. Hertz CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Moses v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Wofford v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Snow v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.