Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Tennessee Valley Marble Holding Co. v. Grunley Construction

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 17, 2006No. Civil Action No. 04-1616 (RCL)PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LAMBERTH, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on four motions. First, defendant Atlantic filed a Motion [44] for Partial Summary-Judgment with respect to plaintiffs claim for “delay damages” arguing that such damages are prohibited under the contract between TVM and Atlantic. Second, plaintiff responded with a Motion [48] to Strike defendant Atlantic’s summary judgment motion, arguing that the delay damages clause is not applicable because plaintiff is claiming “impact” damages rather than “delay” damages. Third, plaintiff filed a Motion [45] for Discovery…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. County of Galveston v. Triple B Services, LLPCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. Alberts v. HCA INC.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  3. Paige International, Inc. v. Xl Speciality Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  4. Tripoli Rocketry Ass'n v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & ExplosivesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  5. Bolger v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API