Legal Opinion
Alberts v. HCA INC.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 19, 2009No. Misc. 06-0088 (RMU)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion FOR Attorney’s Fees and Denying as Moot the Defendants’ Cross-Motion to Strike and the Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court on various motions arising out of certain non-party subpoenas issued by the defendants in connection with an adversary proceeding before the bankruptcy court. 1 The subpoenas were initially issued under the authority of the district court rather than the bankruptcy court. The plaintiff contends that even after the defendants agreed to ask the bankruptcy…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Niedermeier v. Office of BaucusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Linder, David v. Calero-PortocarreroCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Ellipso, Inc. v. MannDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- United States Ex Rel. K & R Ltd. Partnership v. Massachusetts Housing Finance AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mount Hope Church v. Bash Back!Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Precourt v. Fairbank Reconstruction Corp.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2011
- Tripoli Rocketry Ass'n v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & ExplosivesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Goldberg v. Amgen, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Bruce v. Potomac Electric Power Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.