Legal Opinion

Biljac Associates v. First Interstate Bank of Oregon

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1990No. Docket Nos. A041024, A041783PublishedCited by 47 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SMITH, J.

In consolidated appeals, we review summary judgment granted in favor of defendant banks and bank trade associations in actions brought by commercial borrowers, under the Cartwright Act (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 16700 et seq. [all further section references in this opinion are to that code unless otherwise specified]) and unfair competition laws (§ 17200 et seq.), for conspiracy to set and manipulate variable interest rates on loans made to “middle market” commercial borrowers.

We will affirm.

*1416Background

Plaintiffs in these actions are BILJAC Associates, a California partnership…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Reid v. Google, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Kashian v. HarrimanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Jackson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Wall Street Network, Ltd. v. New York Times Co.California Court of Appeal · 2008

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API