Legal Opinion
International Union of Mine, Mill & Smelter Workers, Locals Nos. 15, 17, 107, 108 & 111 v. Eagle-Picher Mining & Smelting Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 18, 1945No. 337PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts
The question presented is whether the National Labor Relations Board after seeking and obtaining a court order of enforcement of its own order, in the absence of fraud or mistake induced by the respondent, and after expiration of the term, is entitled to have the provisions of the decree prescribing the nature of the remedy set aside and the case remanded to it, for the prescription of relief it deems more appropriate to enforce the policy of the National Labor Relations Act.1
In a proceeding instituted by the petitioner unions the Board found that the respondent companies had been guilty of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Licorice Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Ford Motor Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Diamond v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers, Local 283 v. ScofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Amazon Cotton Mill Co. v. Textile Workers UnionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- National Labor Relations Board v. Phoenix Mut. L. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
- Greater Boston Television Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Whdh, Inc., a Massachusetts Corporation, Intervenor. Whdh, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Greater Boston Television Corporation, a Massachusetts Corporation, Intervenor. Charles River Civic Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Whdh, Inc., Boston Broadcasters Inc., Intervenors. Whdh, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Boston Broadcasters, Inc., Intervenor. Greater Boston Tv Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Whdh, Inc., Boston Broadcasters Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.