Legal Opinion
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers, Local 283 v. Scofield
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 8, 1965No. 18PublishedCited by 170 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Warren
The two cases before us present converse sides of a single question — whether parties who are wholly successful in unfair labor practice proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board have a right to intervene in the Court of Appeals review proceedings.
In No. 18 (Scofield), the Union Local was charged by four individual employees with violations of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 61 Stat. 136, 73 Stat. 519, 29 U. S. C. § 151 et seq. (1964 ed.), for fining certain Union members for exceeding incentive pay ceilings set by the Union. The General Counsel of the Board issued a…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Carey v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by170 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Carolyn Morgan v. Church's Fried ChickenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- National Labor Relations Board v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 23Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hohn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Office Of Communication Of The United Church Of Christ v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.