Wiley v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Olivek, Judge:
The protest in this case is directed against the action of the collector of customs at the port of Los Angeles, Calif., in his treatment of two separate entries of pistol parts as entireties.
The protest was submitted on the official papers only and they were • received in evidence without being marked (P. 3). The facts are not in dispute. Consumption entry 1105 covered the importation of two cases consisting of 600 derringer barrels for 22 caliber rimfire pistols which were shipped from West Germany on July 4,1957, on board the airplane “Secca” and arrived at Los Angeles on July…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cunard Steamship Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Worthington v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- United States v. SchoverlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Merritt v. WelshSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Sampson v. PeasleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Heartland By-Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- United States v. Baldt Anchor, Chain & Forge Division of the Boston Metals Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Castelazo v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Baldt Anchor, Chain & Forge Division of the Boston Metals Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970