Legal Opinion

H. S. Dorf & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 14, 1955No. C. D. 1719PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

The merchandise involved in this case consists of linen embroideries, exported from China on or about June 11, 1950. No question is raised in the protest as to the rate of duty on the merchandise, but it is claimed that an allowance should have been granted for case No. 1 on the ground that it was not imported or did not enter the commerce of the country.

This case has been submitted upon a stipulation of counsel stating that the merchandise covered by the entry herein consisted of two cases of linen embroideries, assessed with duty at 70 per centum ad valorem under paragraph…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. ShallusCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. Mills & Gibb Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. McKesson & Robbins (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. Victor Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. H. Z. Bernstein Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  2. Art Craft Jewelry Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. Battat Imp-Export Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  4. Gimbel Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API