Legal Opinion
Jimenez v. Roseville City School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 19, 2016No. C075366PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUARTE, J.
Plaintiff Uriel Jimenez (Jimenez) was injured at a middle school within defendant Roseville City School District (District). The 14-year-old Jimenez was in a classroom where fellow middle school students were purportedly practicing break dancing, but in which some were also performing “flips.” This violated school rules in two ways: first, students had been ordered not to perform flips; second, the teacher who allowed the students to use his classroom for dancing violated school policy by leaving them unsupervised. Jimenez was seriously injured when other students waited for…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Kahn v. East Side Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Dailey v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- C.A. v. William S. Hart Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hass v. Rhodyco Prods., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Grotheer v. Escape Adventures, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Ponte v. Cnty. of Calaveras, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Flake v. Neumiller & BeardsleeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- San Joaquin County Correctional Officers Ass'n v. County of San JoaquinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.