Legal Opinion

Ponte v. Cnty. of Calaveras

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided July 17, 2017No. C079180PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuarte, J.

*553Plaintiff Dennis Ponte is asking defendant County of Calaveras (County) to pay him over $150,000 to reimburse him for work purportedly performed on the County's behalf pursuant to an oral contract. The contract did not contain any fixed payment, and no bid was submitted-far less approved-pursuant to relevant county ordinances governing public contracts. Ponte disregarded opportunities to abandon his claims after the County provided him with pertinent legal authority demonstrating that his claims lacked merit. After multiple sustained demurrers, the trial court granted summary judgment to the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. FPI Development, Inc. v. NakashimaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Wilson v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. Rodriguez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Jones v. Sorenson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Childhelp, Inc. v. City of L.A.California Court of Appeal · 2023
  4. Jones v. SorensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
  5. Kravchuk v. City and County of San Francisco CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API