Baker v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Nobles county, where the action was tried by Perkins, J., without a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
The action is to quiet title to the premises in controversy, plaintiff alleging possession. The defendant claims title thereto under execution sale upon a judgment docketed May 25,1874, against plaintiff’s grantors, who are the common source of title. From June 1, 1872, to December 1, 1874, the plaintiff and one W. I. Teed were partners, doing business under the firm name and style of Teed & Baker. The evidence supports the findings of fact by the court *315that Teed & Baker entered into an agreement in writing for the purchase of the lot in question, upon which was a store building, in June,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- White v. CarpenterNew York Court of Chancery · 1830
- Arnold v. PatrickNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
- Lamberton v. Merchants' National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- Supervisors of Maple Lake v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1867
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lafayette County Bank v. MetcalfMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
- Henderson v. MurraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- City of Marshall v. KalmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Oxborough v. St. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Berryhill v. PotterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.