Legal Opinion

Berryhill v. Potter

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 3, 1890PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Bamsey county, Vilas, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Vanderburgh, J.1

On the 2d day of October, 1883, one Ruden recovered a judgment against Orlando B. Turrell, who then held! the legal title to the real property in question in this suit. Previ*280ous to that date Turrell had contracted to convey the same property to> one E. P. Lewis, by an agreement in writing dated September 20, 1883, and in fulfilment thereof did execute and deliver to him a deed of bargain and sale of the premises on the 15th day of March, 1884. Lewis took actual possession of the premises on the day the contract bears date, and the same was duly recorded before the judgment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arnold v. PatrickNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
  2. Hampson v. EdelenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1806
  3. Welles v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  4. Baker v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Colby v. StreetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Dalrymple v. Security Improvement Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Roberts v. FriedellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Lamm v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. Fleming v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API