Legal Opinion

Higdon v. Williamson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 17, 1913PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Complaint. 1, 1912. Before Judge Morris. Fannin superior court. June

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, P. J.

1. The court’s refusal to strike a plea as being insufficient in law is reviewable by direct exception, and can not be made a ground of a motion for a new trial. Brandon v. Akers, 134 Ga. 78 (67 S. E. 540).

2. Where a payee of a note sues the maker, and the defendant in his plea admits the execution of the note and that the plaintiff is the legal holder, and sets up a defense to the same, the burden is upon the defendant to establish his.defense, and he is entitled to open and conclude. Martin v. Hale, 136 Ga. 228 (71 S. E. 133). This rule is not changed in a case where the defendant in his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin v. HaleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  2. Brandon & Co. v. AkersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Roberts, Cranford & Co. v. DevaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Harrison v. LovettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Kimball v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  3. Tippins v. LaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  4. Hawthorne v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Peretzman v. SimonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API