Legal Opinion
Brandon & Co. v. Akers
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 21, 1910PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Complaint. Before Judge Boan. Boekdale superior court.
1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.
1. Under the ruling in McElveen Commission Co. v. Jackson, 94 Ca. 549 (4), “It is not cause for a new trial that the court refused to dismiss the action on motion of defendant, the ground, of the motion being that the suit was against a partnership composed of two persons, only one of whom had been served, and there was no return of service or of non est inventus as to the other. This is true whether the cases of Printup v. Turner, 65 Ga. 71, and Ells v. Bone, 71 Ga. 466, were correctly ruled or not.”
2. Suit was brought against a partnership alleged to have been composed of two named persons…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hawkins v. StuddardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Ellis v. AlmandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Heery v. BurkhalterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Printup Bros. v. TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
- Ells v. BoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
3Cited by9 opinions
- Callan Court Co. v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Tompkins v. American Land Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Beavers v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Higdon v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- First National Bank v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.