Legal Opinion
Harrison v. Lovett
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 13, 1944No. 14979PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The special appearance to the jurisdiction, filed by Harrison, was based on the ground that he had not been served with the petition and rule; that th» service on H. G. Bell was not service on him, as Bell was not representing him as attorney in this particular proceeding. The petition alleged that Harrison, a resident of Panama City, Florida, had filed a suit against Lovett in the city court of Bainbridge. A copy of this suit, which was attached to the petition, showed that it had been filed by H. G. Bell as attorney. As a general rule,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hecht v. Snook & Austin Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Arnold v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Warren v. Federal Land BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Caswell v. BunchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Gordy v. Levison & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Gordy Tire Co. v. Dayton Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Pethel v. WatersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Dye v. DotsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Dowdell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Rushing v. AkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.