Legal Opinion

Tippins v. Lane

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1937No. 11724PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hutcheson, Justice.

1. It is within the discretion of the trial judge to permit leading questions to be propounded to a witness in the direct examination, or he may sustain objection thereto, a's the ends of justice and the ascertainment of the truth seem to require; and this discretion will not be controlled, unless it be made to appear that injury resulted to the party complaining. Higdon v. Williamson, 140 Ga. 187 (3) (78 S. E. 767); Colley v. Williams, 122 Ga. 841 (50 S. E. 917); City of Rome v. Stewart, 116 Ga. 738 (42 S. E. 1011); Holmes v. Clisby, 121 Ga. 241 (7) (48 S. E. 934, 104 Am.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Holmes v. ClisbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Gill v. WillinghamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  3. Coleman & Burden Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Strickland v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  5. Phinazee v. BunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Company v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  3. Boggus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Mason v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Roberts v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API