Legal Opinion

Vineland National Bank & Trust Co. v. Kotok

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1937No. Appeal, 19PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bt

Kelleb, P. J.,

Plaintiff appeals from the order of the court below discharging its rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in an action of assumpsit.

The action was on a promissory note for $750 signed by the defendant, Sadie Kotok, dated July 13, 1936, payable thirty days after date, to the order of the plaintiff, which it was averred the defendant refused to pay on the due date though requested so to do.

The affidavit of defense admitted that defendant had made and delivered to plaintiff the note in suit but denied liability therefor because of averments,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hemphill v. McClimansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855
  2. Schmid v. HainesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  3. Rathfon v. LocherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Mikos v. KidaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Mohn v. MohnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank of Baltimore v. GarmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Land Bank v. . GarmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Aarons v. Stone, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1940
  4. Western Savings & Deposit Bank v. SauerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API