Rathfon v. Locher
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 40, Jan. T., 1906, by defendant, from order of C. P. Lancaster Co., June T., 1905, No. 22, making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of J. H. Rathfon, Receiver of the City Saving Fund and Trust Company, v. Lila Reno Locher. Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 40, Jan. T., 1906, by defendant, from order of C. P. Lancaster Co., June T., 1905, No. 22, making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of J. H. Rathfon, Receiver of the City Saving Fund and Trust Company, v. Lila Reno Locher. Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. Hassler, J., filed the following opinion: In her affidavit of defense, the defendant questions the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s statement in that it is not accompanied by a copy of the records and proceedings showing his appointment as receiver of…
1Opinion of the Court
Peb Curiam,
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the learned judge of the common pleas.
2Cited by13 opinions
- Volkwein v. Volkwein, Exr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Evans v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1965
- Zumbro v. ZumbroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Young's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Philadelphia & Gulf Steamship Co. v. PechinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.