Legal Opinion

Mohn v. Mohn

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 29, 1917PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Linn District Oourt. — Milo P. Smiti-i, Judge. Suit on promissory note executed by tbe defendant, Lottie J. Mohn; defense that plaintiff obtained same by fraud, and that there is no consideration for it. Both plaintiff and defendants moved for a directed verdict. The motion of defendants was sustained, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.

1' fentu repre-u3u’ education^: etc!?raslCbéarmg thereon. I. In his lifetime, Philip Gr. Mohn, the son of Conrad and Elizabeth Mohn, was the husband of the defendant, Lottie J. Mohn. After the death of Conrad, some conflict arose between Philip and his mother as to the construction of the last will of the father. The dispute was adjusted in such way as that Philip became obligated to pay the mother annually the sum of $350. Both mother and son are now dead. After the death of the son, but in the lifetime of the mother, plaintiff, another son, obtained from defendant a promissory note for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hartman v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Allen v. BrysonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  3. Schaefer v. Anchor Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Grimmell v. WarnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  5. Cole v. Charles City National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jettre v. HealySupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  2. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  3. Commercial Savings Bank v. CareySupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  4. McVay v. CarpeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  5. First Trust Joint Stock Land Bank v. CuthbertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API