Legal Opinion
Sunshine Dairy v. Peterson
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1948PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.
As stated in the joint brief of the appellants, “The principal question presented by this appeal is whether the Oregon Milk Control Act empowers the Director of Agriculture to fix a compulsory differential between the minimum resale prices of milk sold in glass containers, and the minimum resale prices of milk sold in paper or fiber containers.”
The plaintiff operates a dairy in the city of Portland, and is primarily engaged in the distribution of fluid milk and cream in the Portland Sales Area on a wholesale and retail basis. The defendant, E. L. Peterson, is the Director of Agriculture of…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Springer v. Government of Philippine IslandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Addison v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Application of Portland General Elec. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Lane County v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Swift & Co. v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Curly's Dairy, Inc. v. State Department of AgricultureOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- PETERS v. McKAYOregon Supreme Court · 1951
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.