Legal Opinion

Shasta View Irrigation District v. Amoco Chemicals Corp.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1999No. USDC CV9403064-JPC; USCA 96-35869; SC S44723PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*154LEESON, J.

This case is before the court on certified questions of Oregon law from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit under ORS 28.200 et seq. and ORAP 12.20. We take the following facts from the Ninth Circuit’s certification order:

“Shasta View Irrigation District (‘Shasta’) was organized and formed on December 5,1917, pursuant to Chapter 357 of the Oregon Laws of 1917, now Chapter 545 of the Oregon Revised Statutes. There are approximately fifty-six individual members of Shasta. These members own irrigable land within the geographic boundaries of Shasta, and farm or…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Josephs v. BurnsOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Western Helicopter Services, Inc. v. Rogerson Aircraft Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Sealey v. HicksOregon Supreme Court · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Simonsen v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Martin v. Humbert Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. Waxman v. Waxman & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. Warfield v. AlanizDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2006
  5. Gladhart v. Oregon Vineyard Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API