Legal Opinion

Eoff v. Forrest

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1990No. 17901PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MONTGOMERY, Justice.

Section 45-1-106 of the Probate Code of this state (taken largely from the Uniform Probate Code) provides in part:

If fraud has been perpetrated in connection with any proceeding or in any statement filed under the Probate Code or if fraud is used to avoid or circumvent the provisions or purposes of the code, any person injured thereby may obtain appropriate relief against the perpetrator of the fraud including restitution from any person * * * benefiting from the fraud, whether innocent or not.

NMSA 1978, § 45-l-106(A) (Repl. Pamp. 1989).

Seeking to invoke this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Brock Ex Rel. Estate of BrockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Koenig v. PerezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Sauter v. St. Michael's CollegeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Prudential Insurance Company of America v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Lockwood v. BowlesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Romero v. Philip Morris Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Stetser v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Eckhardt v. Charter Hospital of Albuquerque, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Hyden v. LAW FIRM OF McCORMICK, ETC.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Bartlett v. MirabalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API