Legal Opinion

Bartlett v. Mirabal

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 20, 2000No. 19,929PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

APODACA, Judge.

{1} This interlocutory appeal arises from a will contest. Petitioner Gia May Bartlett filed the will of Silvestre Mirabal (Decedent) for formal probate. Decedent’s sister, Respondent Maria R. Mirabal (Contestant), challenged the will on various grounds. Petitioner moved for summary judgment. At the hearing on the motion, Contestant abandoned all grounds for contesting the will except her claim of undue influence. The trial court denied the motion. On appeal, Petitioner argues that the evidentiary standard of proof by clear and convincing evidence should have been applied…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Melnick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Chavez v. Manville Products Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Romero v. Philip Morris Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Cerberus International, Ltd. v. Apollo Management L.P.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  3. Williams v. StewartNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Juneau v. Intel Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Farmington Police Officers Ass'n Communication Workers Local 7911 v. City of FarmingtonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API