Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Brock Ex Rel. Estate of Brock

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1972No. 9429PublishedCited by 258 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OMAN, Justice.

This cause is before us on a writ of certiorari directed to the New Mexico Court of Appeals, which reversed a summary judgment entered by the trial court in favor of defendants, Sears, Roebuck & Company and The Armstrong Rubber Company. Brock v. Goodman, 83 N.M. 580, 494 P.2d 1397 (1972). We reverse the decision •of the Court of Appeals.

The essential facts are set forth in the majority and dissenting opinions of the Court of Appeals. Brock v. Goodman, supra. Briefly, they are: (1) four tires manufactured by Armstrong were sold by Sears on August 2, 1969 to Tom Goodman,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Dyer v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  3. James Chambers and Lydia Chambers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  4. Shramek v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  5. Broderick Wood Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by258 opinions

  1. Wood v. Safeway, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Roth v. ThompsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Pharmaseal Laboratories, Inc. v. GoffeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Romero v. Philip Morris Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Koenig v. PerezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986

253 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API