Goodman v. Brock Ex Rel. Estate of Brock
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OMAN, Justice.
This cause is before us on a writ of certiorari directed to the New Mexico Court of Appeals, which reversed a summary judgment entered by the trial court in favor of defendants, Sears, Roebuck & Company and The Armstrong Rubber Company. Brock v. Goodman, 83 N.M. 580, 494 P.2d 1397 (1972). We reverse the decision •of the Court of Appeals.
The essential facts are set forth in the majority and dissenting opinions of the Court of Appeals. Brock v. Goodman, supra. Briefly, they are: (1) four tires manufactured by Armstrong were sold by Sears on August 2, 1969 to Tom Goodman,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Dyer v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- James Chambers and Lydia Chambers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Shramek v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966
- Broderick Wood Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by258 opinions
- Wood v. Safeway, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
- Roth v. ThompsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Pharmaseal Laboratories, Inc. v. GoffeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- Romero v. Philip Morris Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- Koenig v. PerezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
253 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.