Levy v. Dusenbery
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Edgar T. Zook, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an appeal by defendant from an adverse judgment in an action brought in the name of Watson, Pond & Riddle (a corporation), the present plaintiffs being afterward substituted for them, for the recovery of one thousand two hundred dollars for services claimed to have been performed for the defendant in bringing about an exchange of real estate in San Francisco.
It appears from the evidence that from time to time during a period of more than a month prior to October 25, 1909, F. W. Thurston, the accredited representative of Watson, Pond & Riddle, had been endeavoring to effect an exchange…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bank of Lemoore v. FulghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Alexander v. Central Lumber & Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Phelps v. PruschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Moore v. SmeadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Dunn v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Le Blond v. WolfeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Bond v. Peabody Coal Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Bryant v. WellbanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Worley v. CarrollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Cowles Publishing Co. v. McMannWashington Supreme Court · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.