Legal Opinion

Crystal Corporation v. Manhattan Chemical Mfg. Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 4, 1935No. Patent Appeal 3416PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAND, Associate Judge.

In the United States Patent Office the appellant instituted an opposition proceeding directed against the registration by ap-pellee of the trade-mark “T. Z. L. B” for talcum powder for use on the human skin and especially for use in the nursery.

Appellant’s opposition was grounded upon its prior adoption, use, and registration of its trade-mark “Z. B. T.” for talcum powder. It claimed it adopted the mark “Z. B. T.” in 1922 and registered the same in 1926. The application for the 1926 registration recites that the appellant is the owner of the trade-mark “Crystal Z. B.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Armour & Co. v. Louisville Provision Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  2. American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Michigan Fruit Growers, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  3. Helen Schy-Man-Ski & Sons v. S. S. S. Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
  4. Gillette v. Gillette Safety Razor Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
  5. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. C. Kenyon Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Weiss Associates, Inc. v. Hrl Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. Proctor & Gamble Co. v. J. L. Prescott Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
  3. Plough, Inc. v. Intercity Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. New York State Electric & Gas Corp. v. U.S. Gas & Electric, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2010
  5. Elgin American Mfg. Co. v. Elizabeth Arden, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API