Legal Opinion
Armour & Co. v. Louisville Provision Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 14, 1922No. 3597PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant is a corporation organized in 1900 under the laws of Illinois, as successor to a partnership of the same name, and has been engaged during its entire corporate existence in the business of preparing, packing, and selling meat products, including hams and bacons, at Chicago, Ill., and elsewhere throughout the United States, that having likewise been the business of its copartnership predecessor. Defendant-appellee is a corporation organized in 1910 under the laws of Kentucky, and ever since engaged at Louisville, Ky., in preparing, packing, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Howe Scale Co. v. Wyckoff, Seamans & BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Goodyear's India Rubber Glove Manufacturing Co. v. Goodyear Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Rathbone, Sard & Co. v. Champion Steed Range Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- Layton Pure Food Co. v. Church & Dwight Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- B. H. Bunn Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Aaa Replacement Parts Co., Inc., Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Emerson Electric Mfg. Co. v. Emerson Radio & Phonograph Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- James Heddon's Sons v. Millsite Steel & Wire Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Johnston v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Mfg. Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.