Legal Opinion

American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Michigan Fruit Growers, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 19, 1930No. Patent Appeal 2248PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATFIELD, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal, in a trade-mark opposition proceeding, from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences dismissing the opposition of appellant and adjudging appellee entitled to the registration of a composite trade-mark, Serial No. 218,-983, consisting of the word “Michigander” and representations of two or three kinds of fruit inclosed within a double circle, together with an “outline tracing of the lower peninsula of Michigan, and the representation of a goose in white” upon a blaek and white background,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Goodall Worsted Co. v. Palm Knitting Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
  3. Alaska Packers' Ass'n v. Getz Bros. & Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1919
  4. Booth Fisheries Co. v. Adams & Sons Grocer Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Shoe Corporation of America v. Juvenile Shoe Corporation of AmericaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  2. Crystal Corporation v. Manhattan Chemical Mfg. Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
  3. D. J. Bielzoff Products Co. v. White Horse Distillers, Ltd.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
  4. Celanese Corporation of America v. Vanity Fair Silk MillsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  5. Decker & Cohn, Inc. v. S. Liebovitz Sons, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API