Legal Opinion

Plough, Inc. v. Intercity Oil Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 17, 1939No. 7581PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELSH, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Plough, Inc., filed its bill of complaint to enjoin the Intercity Oil Company and the Eveready Oil Company from using the name “Eveready” in connection with the manufacture and sale of motor oils and greases, and for damages resulting from tire alleged infringement of the plaintiff’s registered trade mark, “Ever Ready,” under which it distributes a lighter lubricant. Plaintiff also seeks to restrain the defendant, Eveready Oil Company, from using the same word as a part of its corporate title.

In 1922 the plaintiff began the manufacture and sale of a light…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dwight S. Williams Co., Inc. v. Lykens Hosiery Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
  2. Time, Inc. v. T.I.M.E. Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
  3. Crown Central Petroleum Corp. v. Standard Oil Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  4. In Re Crucible Steel Co. Of AmericaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  5. Application of JosserandCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API