Legal Opinion
Proctor & Gamble Co. v. J. L. Prescott Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 29, 1935No. Patent Appeal 3462PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLAND, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, affirming a decision of the Examiner of Trade-Mark Interferences, sustaining the petition of appellee for the cancellation of appellant’s trade-mark “Chipso,” both tribunals holding that said mark was confusingly similar to the registered trade-mark of appellee “CPIASE-0,” said marks being applied to goods of the same descriptive properties.
Appellant’s mark “Chipso,” printed at an oblique angle, was registered on April 12, 1921, upon an application filed October 22, 1920, under the Trade-Mark Act of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- O. & W. Thum Co. v. DickinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
- California Packing Corporation v. Tillman & BendelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- B. F. Goodrich Co. v. HockmeyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Van Camp Sea Food Co. v. Alexander B. Stewart OrganizationsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Cluett, Peabody & Co. v. HartogensisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. J. L. Prescott Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Proctor & Gamble Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Willson v. Graphol Products Co., IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- Lightnin Chemical Co. v. Royal Home Products, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- Fred W. Amend Co. v. American Character Doll Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.