Legal Opinion

Highway Express Lines, Inc. v. Winter

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 11, 1964No. Appeal, No. 241; Appeal, No. 244PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

In November 1963, the City of Philadelphia (City), issued an invitation to trucking firms to bid on a pro*342posed contract with the City for hauling surplus food distributed under the auspices of the Department of Public Welfare. These invitations stated that bids would be publicly opened on November 27, 1963, and, included in the specifications for potential bidders, was the requirement that such bids be accompanied by evidence of approved rate tariffs for the bidder since the service or equipment involved was regulated by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Heilig Bros. Co., Inc. v. KohlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. R. S. Noonan, Inc. v. York School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Kratz v. AllentownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Pearlman v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Amer. Pavement Co. v. WagnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Independent Enterprises Inc. Thomas Lozecki v. Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority City of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. Weber v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Conduit & Foundation Corp. v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Ara Services, Inc. v. School District of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. J. P. Mascaro & Sons, Inc. v. Township of BristolCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API