Legal Opinion
Three Rivers Cablevision, Inc. v. City of Pittsburgh
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 12, 1980No. Civ. A. 80-334PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIAMOND, District Judge.
This litigation arises out of the award by the city of Pittsburgh (city) of a cable television contract for which several companies, including plaintiff Three Rivers Cablevision, Inc. (Three Rivers), were bidding. Plaintiffs, Three Rivers and one Matthew Moore, a party to a stock subscription agreement by which he would have become a shareholder of Three Rivers if the latter had been awarded the aforesaid contract, filed this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, § 1985, and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution alleging that they were the…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Szabo Food Service, Inc. v. Canteen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Cinevision Corp. v. City of BurbankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Independent Enterprises Inc. Thomas Lozecki v. Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority City of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Curtis Ambulance of Florida, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Shawnee, Kansas, and Medevac Midamerica, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Kim Construction Company, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of the Village of MundeleinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.