Legal Opinion
Bank-Fund Staff Federal Credit Union v. Cuellar
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 15, 1994No. 91-CV-1325, 92-CV-282PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Chief Judge:
These consolidated appeals involve the right to cure residential mortgage foreclosure defaults under D.C.Code § 45-715.1 (Repl.1990). 1 In the first appeal, No. 91-CV-1325, appellant Bank-Fund Staff Federal Credit Union sued the Vivados, appellees, 2 for possession of real property and now appeals from the grant of summary judgment to appellees. The Bank-Fund contends that the trial judge erred (1) in ruling that the Bank-Fund’s statutory notice of foreclosure was deficient for failure to include a statement of the amount necessary to cure the Vivados’ loan default,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- District of Columbia v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Parreco v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. PrioleauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Daniel Logan v. LaSalle Bank National AssociationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- DIABY v. BiermanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Robinson v. Deutsche Bank National Trust CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- DENNIS T. COMER v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.