Legal Opinion
District of Columbia v. Murphy
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 15, 1941No. Nos. 58 and 59PublishedCited by 227 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson
These cases, which have been argued together, differ somewhat in facts, but each involves a controversy as to whether respondent was domiciled within the District of Columbia on December 31, 1939, within the meaning of § 2 (a) of the District of Columbia Income Tax Act, 1 which lays a tax on “the taxable income of every individual domiciled in the District of Columbia on the last day of the taxable year.” The following facts appear from proceedings before the Board of Tax Appeals for the District of Columbia:
The respondent in No. 58, a single man, first came to the District of Columbia in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- TEXAS v. FLORIDA Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Gilbert v. DavidSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Williamson v. OsentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Anderson v. WattSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by227 opinions
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- District of Columbia v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- George S. Krasnov v. Brendan DinanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
222 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.